<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATI x850 Working, but not with X11R7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/</link>
	<description>readers are plentiful, thinkers are rare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren Falk</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Falk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I was able to get it working without these settings when I retried everything.  It&#039;s possible something&#039;s changed since the first time.  I have switched to the open source radeon drivers anyway because they seem a good deal more stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to get it working without these settings when I retried everything.  It&#8217;s possible something&#8217;s changed since the first time.  I have switched to the open source radeon drivers anyway because they seem a good deal more stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Falk</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Falk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>This is some good information, thanks.  I&#039;ll give these a try again once I get everything working the way I want on Xorg 6.8.2.  I can&#039;t seem to get dual head working with my ATI card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is some good information, thanks.  I&#8217;ll give these a try again once I get everything working the way I want on Xorg 6.8.2.  I can&#8217;t seem to get dual head working with my ATI card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbar</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>mbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I also found this bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110506 and I think it might be connected, as I use LDFLAGS=&quot;-Wl,-O1 -Wl,-s -Wl,z,now&quot;. That z,now seems to be a culprit, bug description says &quot;problem with X is that it cannot operate correctly with the immediate symbol loading of -z now&quot; and &quot;getting rid of the circular dependancies that result from using -z now is not a high priority, but that in the meantime we only need to supplant xorg-server and x11-drivers/* packages with -nonow passed as a compile flag&quot;. I will try this solution when I get home in the evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also found this bug <a href="http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110506" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110506</a> and I think it might be connected, as I use LDFLAGS=&#8221;-Wl,-O1 -Wl,-s -Wl,z,now&#8221;. That z,now seems to be a culprit, bug description says &#8220;problem with X is that it cannot operate correctly with the immediate symbol loading of -z now&#8221; and &#8220;getting rid of the circular dependancies that result from using -z now is not a high priority, but that in the meantime we only need to supplant xorg-server and x11-drivers/* packages with -nonow passed as a compile flag&#8221;. I will try this solution when I get home in the evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbar</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>mbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>You can use 6.9.0 snapshot instead. It&#039;s the same as modular xorg 7, but in monolithic version. This works on amd64 with gcc 4.1, glibc 2.4. Get an overlay here http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898.html because portage&#039;s 6.9 version has some compilation bugs. And mask 7.0 version ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use 6.9.0 snapshot instead. It&#8217;s the same as modular xorg 7, but in monolithic version. This works on amd64 with gcc 4.1, glibc 2.4. Get an overlay here <a href="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898.html" rel="nofollow">http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898.html</a> because portage&#8217;s 6.9 version has some compilation bugs. And mask 7.0 version ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
