<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATI x850 Working, but not with X11R7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/</link>
	<description>readers are plentiful, thinkers are rare</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren Falk</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Falk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I was able to get it working without these settings when I retried everything.  It's possible something's changed since the first time.  I have switched to the open source radeon drivers anyway because they seem a good deal more stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to get it working without these settings when I retried everything.  It&#8217;s possible something&#8217;s changed since the first time.  I have switched to the open source radeon drivers anyway because they seem a good deal more stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Falk</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Falk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>This is some good information, thanks.  I'll give these a try again once I get everything working the way I want on Xorg 6.8.2.  I can't seem to get dual head working with my ATI card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is some good information, thanks.  I&#8217;ll give these a try again once I get everything working the way I want on Xorg 6.8.2.  I can&#8217;t seem to get dual head working with my ATI card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbar</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>mbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I also found this bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110506 and I think it might be connected, as I use LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,-s -Wl,z,now". That z,now seems to be a culprit, bug description says "problem with X is that it cannot operate correctly with the immediate symbol loading of -z now" and "getting rid of the circular dependancies that result from using -z now is not a high priority, but that in the meantime we only need to supplant xorg-server and x11-drivers/* packages with -nonow passed as a compile flag". I will try this solution when I get home in the evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also found this bug <a href="http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110506" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110506</a> and I think it might be connected, as I use LDFLAGS=&#8221;-Wl,-O1 -Wl,-s -Wl,z,now&#8221;. That z,now seems to be a culprit, bug description says &#8220;problem with X is that it cannot operate correctly with the immediate symbol loading of -z now&#8221; and &#8220;getting rid of the circular dependancies that result from using -z now is not a high priority, but that in the meantime we only need to supplant xorg-server and x11-drivers/* packages with -nonow passed as a compile flag&#8221;. I will try this solution when I get home in the evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbar</title>
		<link>http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>mbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 04:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warrenfalk.com/blog/2006/04/11/ati-x850-working-but-not-with-x11r7/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>You can use 6.9.0 snapshot instead. It's the same as modular xorg 7, but in monolithic version. This works on amd64 with gcc 4.1, glibc 2.4. Get an overlay here http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898.html because portage's 6.9 version has some compilation bugs. And mask 7.0 version ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can use 6.9.0 snapshot instead. It&#8217;s the same as modular xorg 7, but in monolithic version. This works on amd64 with gcc 4.1, glibc 2.4. Get an overlay here <a href="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898.html" rel="nofollow">http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-396898.html</a> because portage&#8217;s 6.9 version has some compilation bugs. And mask 7.0 version ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
